Comments on: F-105 Thunderchief #18 | Wings http://www.b1modelproject.com/f-105-thunderchief-18-wings/2166 Bob Moore brings you Bob TV. RC Turbine Jet Building Action! Sun, 05 Feb 2012 19:38:41 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Lou Lombardi http://www.b1modelproject.com/f-105-thunderchief-18-wings/2166/comment-page-1#comment-1251 Lou Lombardi Fri, 30 Jul 2010 15:35:07 +0000 http://www.b1modelproject.com/?p=2166#comment-1251 Bob: Would you please send me the link for the 1/6" tape. Also I have a brand new (once tested) Eurokit hydraulic kit which did not work out for me. I also purchased two (2) of the hydraulic disconnects. If you need this kit let me know and I will donate it to you for the B-1 or others you are building F-105). The value is over $450.00. If you get a chance e mail me or give me your phone number and I will call you. Keep up the good work. Lou Lombardi Bob:

Would you please send me the link for the 1/6″ tape.

Also I have a brand new (once tested) Eurokit hydraulic kit which did not work out for me. I also purchased two (2) of the hydraulic disconnects.

If you need this kit let me know and I will donate it to you for the B-1 or others you are building F-105). The value is over $450.00.

If you get a chance e mail me or give me your phone number and I will call you.

Keep up the good work.

Lou Lombardi

]]> By: catman http://www.b1modelproject.com/f-105-thunderchief-18-wings/2166/comment-page-1#comment-1250 catman Fri, 30 Jul 2010 13:15:06 +0000 http://www.b1modelproject.com/?p=2166#comment-1250 The Air Force is very fond of the F for fighter designation and is quick to apply it to any fast-mover that has even the most rudimentary ability to preform in a tactical role like a true fighter, the A-10 being a rare exception. Tony McPeak, one time Air Force chief of staff hated the A-10, by the way, because he said it did not look like a fighter and tried to give it to the Army. Many of the Air Force's F's would be designated A-whatever were they Navy aircraft because their primary mission is/was air to ground. Practically anything can be configured to carry bombs, but only aircraft with a strategic mission and capability are designated B-whatever in the Air Force -- B-17, B-29, B-52, the Bone, B-2, etc. So, if it's tactical it is an F, if it is strategic, it is a B. More or less. The Air Force is very fond of the F for fighter designation and is quick to apply it to any fast-mover that has even the most rudimentary ability to preform in a tactical role like a true fighter, the A-10 being a rare exception. Tony McPeak, one time Air Force chief of staff hated the A-10, by the way, because he said it did not look like a fighter and tried to give it to the Army. Many of the Air Force’s F’s would be designated A-whatever were they Navy aircraft because their primary mission is/was air to ground. Practically anything can be configured to carry bombs, but only aircraft with a strategic mission and capability are designated B-whatever in the Air Force — B-17, B-29, B-52, the Bone, B-2, etc. So, if it’s tactical it is an F, if it is strategic, it is a B. More or less.

]]> By: Jim J http://www.b1modelproject.com/f-105-thunderchief-18-wings/2166/comment-page-1#comment-1249 Jim J Fri, 30 Jul 2010 05:15:19 +0000 http://www.b1modelproject.com/?p=2166#comment-1249 I was hoping a bikini clad babe was gonna pop outa of that box Bob! I was hoping a bikini clad babe was gonna pop outa of that box Bob!

]]>